Welcome to our community.

In this community, you can submit ideas, vote on existing ideas, or add comments.

To submit an idea, please click the Submit New Idea button at the top of the navigation sidebar. You will then be asked to add a title and choose a campaign for the new idea. You will also have the option to add tags to the idea. To vote on an idea, simply click the up or down arrows to the right of the idea title/description. And to add a comment, click in the box below the idea.

If you would like to see all ideas created with a specific tag, you can click on the word or phrase via the tagcloud in the navigation sidebar area under "What we're discussing". You can also view ideas sorted by Campaigns from the right navigation area. To return to this page, click the All Ideas link.

Campaign: Website

Donation Button

Hi James,

 

I've used your site off and on for years. Could you please add a donation button to facilitate those of us who would like to say thanks?

 

Cheers,

Paul Thompson

Submitted by

Voting

5 votes
Active

Campaign: Website

Donation Button

Hi James,

 

I've used your site off and on for years. Could you please add a donation button to facilitate those of us who would like to say thanks?

 

Cheers,

Paul Thompson

Submitted by

Voting

5 votes
Active

Campaign: Website

RFC 2181 10.3 - compliance check needed

www.countrybus.org does not (currently) resolve if you use BIND nameservers. This is because it violates the RFC by using NS records that point at CNAMEs. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2181#section-10.3 This was an absolute smeg to diagnose. Squish dnscheck V2 doesn't see it. Dnscheck V1 *does* highlight it (but doesn't say it's actually bad). Can detection for this really really nasty SERVFAIL thing get added to ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

1 vote
Active

Campaign: Website

RFC 2181 10.3 - compliance check needed

www.countrybus.org does not (currently) resolve if you use BIND nameservers. This is because it violates the RFC by using NS records that point at CNAMEs. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2181#section-10.3 This was an absolute smeg to diagnose. Squish dnscheck V2 doesn't see it. Dnscheck V1 *does* highlight it (but doesn't say it's actually bad). Can detection for this really really nasty SERVFAIL thing get added to ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

1 vote
Active

Campaign: Website

为人民服务

为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

0 votes
Active

Campaign: Website

为人民服务

为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 为人民服务18922553323 ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

0 votes
Active

Displaying all 14 Ideas